On Monday You Become the Boss of the Two People You Complain to About the Boss

The group chat goes quiet before anyone says a word

You hear on a Thursday. By Friday lunchtime the whole floor knows, and somewhere in between, the chat you've been in for two years — the one where you all agreed the quarterly deck was unreadable — slows down.

Nobody removes you. That would be a decision, and decisions can be discussed. It just gets quieter, and then a second chat exists that you aren't in, and you find out about it the way you'll find out about most things now. Late, and by accident.

That's week one. Weeks two through eight are worse, because they're specific.

The last week of August

Here's the specific bit.

Your closest work friend puts in for the last week of August. Someone who has been on the team nine years wants the same week. Only one of them can have it, you're the person who says which, and the handover note you were given says don't play favourites — which is not a thing you can do with one week in August and two people who both want it and both know you.

That's the shape of the whole job now. You don't have a principles problem. You know the principles, and so does everyone who has ever written them down for you. What you have is four people you know extremely well, whose reaction to anything you do you can predict almost word for word, and no general rule that tells you what sentence to say to any of them on Monday morning.

So, person by person, in an order. Hardest first.

The friend, in the first few days

Before anything has gone wrong. That's the only timing rule worth keeping, and the reason is mechanical: once there's an incident — a rota, a review, a decision that went against her — anything you say is a response to the incident, and it gets heard as one.

One conversation. Off site if you can manage it. It does two things: says the friendship isn't being downgraded, and says one specific thing that is now different.

The mistake is doing only the first half. Nothing changes between us is the sentence everyone reaches for, and your friend already knows it's false. Say it and you've taught her that you'll say comfortable untrue things to her now, which is a strange lesson to open with.

Closer to what's true: I want to keep this. And there's one thing I have to change, which is that I can't be the person you vent to about work any more, because I'm now part of the thing you'd be venting about, and I'd have to do something with it.

Then stop talking. Don't fill the silence with reassurance. Let her say what she thinks of that, including the unflattering version, which you will want very badly to argue with.

If it goes well, the second half of that conversation is you asking her to tell you when you're being weird about it. Because you will be, and she's the only person on the team who can say so.

The over-correction

Everyone worries about favouritism.

The failure I'd bet on is the opposite one. You give the friend the worse assignment, the tighter deadline, the harsher read on a middling piece of work, to prove something to a room that mostly isn't watching.

Back to August. If the week goes to the nine-year colleague because giving it to your friend would look bad, you've just made a staffing decision on the basis of your own reputation, and you'll do it again, because it worked — nobody said anything. Eventually your friend notices a pattern she can't quite name and won't raise. That's what kills it. Not the holiday.

Decide it on whatever rule you'd use if neither of them were your friend. Who asked first. Whatever your team already treats as fair. Then say out loud which rule you used.

Say the rule and the rule does your defending for you. Nobody can see your intentions, so your intentions defend nothing.

The person who applied

Inside the first week. And you go to them; they will not come to you.

Don't wait for them to be fine. They will be extremely fine. Polite, on time, technically flawless, and about eleven degrees colder than they were a month ago. That isn't passive aggression, it's dignity. Treat that coldness as a behaviour problem and you'll have a resignation by October.

Things not to say:

• I know this is awkward. Now they have to manage your discomfort as well as their own.
• Anything about how you didn't expect it, or didn't ask for it. It reads as an apology for existing, and it implies the decision was arbitrary, which insults them twice.
• Any promise about next time. You don't control next time.
• I hope we can still be normal about this. The one people actually say. It hands them the job of reassuring you, on the worst week they've had at work in years.

What's left is plainer: you applied, you didn't get it, I did, and I'd rather say that out loud than have us both pretend the last month didn't happen. I'm not going to tell you how to feel about it. What I want to know is what you want out of the next year, because I'd rather build that with you than lose you.

The hard part is that you have to mean the last clause. If you aren't prepared to put them on something that visibly develops them within a quarter, don't say it. An unbacked version of that sentence is worse than saying nothing at all.

They may also ask why they didn't get it. If you know, and it's yours to share, share it plainly. If you don't know, say you don't know, and offer to find out from whoever decided.

Do not invent a kind reason. A soft fake reason is a reliable way to kill this relationship, and it dies quietly, months later, in an exit interview you don't get to read.

The team, last

This order surprises people. Surely you address the group first?

No. Whatever you say to the room, those two are sitting in it doing arithmetic about whether you've spoken to them privately yet. Get to the room first and you've told your friend and the colleague who applied that they're an audience.

Keep the group version short. Say what you're not going to change in the first month, then honour it exactly. Say how you want to hear bad news. And answer the thing they actually care about, which is what happens to the stuff they used to complain to you about, now that complaining to you is a different act with consequences.

One line I'd use: you can still tell me the deck is unreadable. What's changed is that I now have to do something about it. So tell me if you want that, and tell me if you don't.

What it costs

Some of the friendship is going.

Not all of it, and maybe not the best part, but some — specifically the part that ran on shared powerlessness. You bonded partly over having the same boss and no control over anything. That fuel is gone and it isn't coming back while you hold this job.

Pretending otherwise is what makes the next six months bad. If you insist nothing has changed, then every time something obviously has, your friend has to choose between calling you a liar and going quiet. Going quiet is the easier of the two.

Say the loss out loud once, early, to the person it belongs to. Then get on with the job.

The part an article can't do

Which of them has been there longest. Who owes whom a favour. Which one already has an offer somewhere else. What got said in the pub in March. You know all of that and I don't, and it's what actually decides how these four conversations should go.

What I'd say is: don't compose them for the first time while you're having them. Write down, badly, what you'd say to each person. Then read it back and cut every sentence that's there to make you feel better rather than to tell them something. In most drafts that's about a third of it, and it's always the warmest third.

The second chat

Do the friend on Monday.

All four conversations are meant to happen inside a fortnight, and the deadline isn't arbitrary. Your team is deciding what kind of manager you are on evidence they'll gather before you've had any chance to be good at the job. That's unfair, and it happens anyway. The version of you still drafting the friend conversation in week six has answered the question by not answering it.

None of it gets you back into the group chat.

That chat carries on without you. Some evening in October somebody will forward you a screenshot from it, and there'll be a joke in the corner of it you don't understand, referring to a conversation you weren't in. That's the job. You're the person they're careful around now, and the two people you used to be careless with are the two who need the most careful thing you've ever said.

---

TrueTalk publishes this blog. TrueTalk is an app — on the web, the App Store and Google Play — with 164 AI advisors. They are written personas, each with a profession, defined areas of expertise, a backstory and a way of talking. They are not people, and they are not therapists, doctors, lawyers or financial advisers. Anything clinical, legal or safety-critical needs a real professional; an advisor is somewhere to think out loud first, at whatever hour the problem actually shows up. This piece is bound to Leadership Lucy, a team leadership persona. The first conversation is free. After that it's a subscription. truetalk.app